Skip to main content

Leadership is like archery

Leadership is like archery – the leader is the shaft, and the rules are the string. Keep the balance – too loose, the bow is useless; too tight, and the bow will break. Finding that sweet spot is the key to effective leadership. 

ЁЯП╣ #Leadership #Balance #Wisdom 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ramo Vigrahavan Dharmah

A great verse from Ramayana: рдЖрд╣ाрд░ рдиिрдж्рд░ा рднрдп рдоैрдеुрдиं рдЪ  рд╕ाрдоाрди्рдпрдоेрддрдд् рдкрд╢ुрднिрд░्рдирд░ाрдгाрдо् । рдзрд░्рдоो рд╣ि рддेрд╖ाрдордзिрдХो рд╡िрд╢ेрд╖:  рдзрд░्рдоेрдг рд╣ीрдиाः рдкрд╢ुрднिः рд╕рдоाрдиाः ॥ AhAra-nidrA-bhaya-maithunam cha samAnam_etat_pashubhir_narANAm | dharmo hi teShAm adhiko visheSho dharmeNa hInAH pashubhiH samAnAH|| Eating, Sleep, Fear and Sex ; these habits are common between human beings and animals. It is the Dharma which is the special quality of the human beings. Without the Dharma, they are similar to the animals.  Rama is The Embodiment Of Dharma.  Maaricha, while speaking to Ravana- (Aranya Kandam 37-13): рд░ाрдоो рд╡िрдЧ्рд░рд╣рд╡ाрди् рдзрд░्рдоः рд╕ाрдзुः рд╕рдд्рдп рдкрд░ाрдХ्рд░рдоः | рд░ाрдЬा рд╕рд░्рд╡рд╕्рдп рд▓ोрдХрд╕्рдп рджेрд╡ाрдиाрдо् рдЗрд╡ рд╡ाрд╕рд╡ः || рей-рейрен-резрей|| raamo vigrahavaan dharmaH saadhuH satya paraakramaH | raajaa sarvasya lokasya devaanaam iva vaasavaH || 3-37-13 "Rama is the embodiment of righteousness, he is an equable person with truthfulness as his valour, and as with Indra to all gods he is the king of entire world. [3-37-13] Anot...

Team Work

What Is Intelligence, Anyway? - Isaac Asimov

When I was in the army, I received the kind of aptitude test that all soldiers took and, against a normal of 100, scored 160. No one at the base had ever seen a figure like that, and for two hours they made a big fuss over me. (It didn't mean anything. The next day I was still a buck private with KP - kitchen police - as my highest duty.) All my life I've been registering scores like that, so that I have the complacent feeling that I'm highly intelligent, and I expect other people to think so too. Actually, though, don't such cores simply mean that I am very good at answering the type of academic questions that are considered worthy of answers by people who make up the intelligence tests - people with intellectual bents similar to mine? For instance, I had an auto-repair man once, who, on these intelligence tests, could not possibly have scored more than 80, by my estimate. I always took it for granted that I was far more intelligent than he was. Yet, when any...